Re: The Great --3v3-- Tournament Topic
Date: February 25, 2010 02:20AM
i like the idea of random teams, but...
it shouldnt be +1 for both sides when the game lasts longer than turn 60, it would be better if only the loosin team gets a +1 bonus.
also if the game is decided before turn 20 +4 for the winners and 0 for the loosers, no minus scores.
a +1 for every time a cap is taken to the winner team, no matter if winner or loser team has taken a cap. like a jackpot system.
anyway what you would need for this system would be a proper ranking system cuz all these loser fags will avoid playing with new or not so experienced players. so you get a teams average with wich you could multiplicate or divide, or a way to make up teams.
RIPPE 10, Madwurst 8, l--X--l 5
Opale 7, Atlas 10, blanka 6
the numbers would be the ranking points 10 max - 1 min. added it would be 23 vs 23. +-2 could make fair teams. how to set the ranking points is another question though...
(in the manners of the capitalistic world, the ranking could be connected to the 1 vs 1 tournament rankings, the only working ranking system yet. (realitywise only to populate the 1 vs 1 tournament.) ahh synergetic effects, fuck all PR people!)
i am pretty sure this could bang but it has to be smart to work and it should advance gameplay into a direction where giving up is not a choice anymore.
more players, more rules
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/25/2010 02:21AM by -RIPPE-.