2 vs 1
Date: July 10, 2007 06:59AM
Ok, i gotta say some words bout the 2 vs 1 crap shit i had to read recently.
If you consider yourself as an outstanding conqueror (just as I do) there is simply no necessity in playing 2 vs 1. It is much too easy to win games by playing 2 vs 1 and it wouldnt satisfy me to win this game the easy way.
If your opponent is massively stronger than all other players together, I would rather die fighting that fat pig till last man standing, then beg others to help me just to win the game.
Really honorable victorys can only be achieved by economical inferiority and tactical superiority.
Unfortunately I am almost always in a superior position (economical and tactical) so that I have just a few real challenges and challengers in this game.
I always stand aside those players that get attacked by two and fight even if I am sure to loose (may happen if I join late).
At last I have to confess that I very, very rarely do 2 vs 1 myself, only to kill both and always announcing that I will kill both.
But the most important thing about 2 vs 1 is:
LOOSING BY 1VS1 WILL MAKE YOU STRONGER, WINNING BY 2VS1 WILL NOT.