Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: Igna ()
Date: September 01, 2007 08:24AM

The Furycan thing is simple; he didn't beat anyone, so he goes at the bottom. You gain ranks by beating people, not by getting really close. He hasn't gained any ranks.

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: Captain Planet ()
Date: September 01, 2007 11:11AM

How difficult can it be? So all you have to do is play the 1st person, lose and get into second place? Retarded.

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: jynx ()
Date: September 01, 2007 01:59PM

1. hmmm
2. JD
3. Davo
4. Liquid
5. Hero
6. Capt Planet
7. jynXXX
8. Perfect
9. PV_mercenary
10. Hallali
11. Icadil
12. Keira
13. osetsky
14. PV_TheRed
15. Roach
16. Furycan

:)

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: hallali ()
Date: September 01, 2007 09:01PM


I beat hmmm. First he refused fighting me, saying i was a too bad player and should work my way up the list before challenging him...haha

1. hallali
2. hmmm
3. JD
4. Davo
5. Liquid
6. Hero
7. Capt Planet
8. jynXXX
9. Perfect
10. PV_mercenary
11. Icadil
12. Keira
13. osetsky
14. PV_TheRed
15. Roach
16. Furycan

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: hallali ()
Date: September 01, 2007 10:44PM

I have to confess...hmmmm won the rematch. So it´s

1. hmmm
2. hallali
3. JD
4. Davo
5. Liquid
6. Hero
7. Capt Planet
8. jynXXX
9. Perfect
10. PV_mercenary
11. Icadil
12. Keira
13. osetsky
14. PV_TheRed
15. Roach
16. Furycan

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: hmmm ()
Date: September 01, 2007 10:49PM

Any thoughts on whether to go with jynxxx idea that you can only play with 4 rungs or other ways to keep the ladder fair and stable?

hallali was competitve enough to jump up 9 rungs, but having most of the ladder trying to challenge me is going to get tiring.

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: hallali ()
Date: September 02, 2007 04:57AM

Anybody can challenge anybody i say. It´s the price of being on the top. You have to prove you are good enough to stay there.

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: jynx ()
Date: September 02, 2007 06:16AM

Wasn't a competition to see who is top dawg, just a system to have some slight ranking.

Another problem is that #1 will get tired of it. They only have to play 1 game a week to hold their position. If 15 people are all trying to battle them when they get on, they just might choose to only play 1 game a week. I know if everytime I got on someone wanted to 1v1, I would love it ... for the first 3 days maybe. Then I'd just get tired of it, and start saying no, I already did my battle this week :) And I would make sure to have that battle with rung 15 or so.

So, another aspect of this is to avoid top players from not playing eachother, along with keeping bottom players from playing top players.

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: XuuL ()
Date: September 02, 2007 12:45PM

i played with RIPPE and lost, so

1. hmmm
2. hallali
3. JD
4. Davo
5. Liquid
6. Hero
7. Capt Planet
8. jynXXX
9. Perfect
10. PV_mercenary
11. Icadil
12. Keira
13. osetsky
14. PV_TheRed
15. Roach
16. Furycan
17. RIPPE
18. XuuL

_______________________
hmmm.. when about are u online?

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: Perfect ()
Date: September 02, 2007 01:38PM

1. hmmm
2. hallali
3. JD
4. Davo
5. Liquid
6. Hero
7. Capt Planet
8. jynXXX
9. Xuul *
10. Perfect
11. PV_mercenary
12. Icadil
13. Keira
14. osetsky
15. PV_TheRed
16. Roach
17. Furycan
18. RIPPE

Xuul beat me.
Im on a 3 game losing streak hurray. I would suggest if a player loses five games in a row. (or moves down five spots) they be put in last place regardless.
ALso I think players should only be able to challenge players within five rungs of their position.
-P

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: jynx ()
Date: September 02, 2007 05:39PM

XuuL beat me:

1. hmmm
2. hallali
3. JD
4. Davo
5. Liquid
6. Hero
7. Capt Planet
8. Xuul
9. jynXXX
10. Perfect
11. PV_mercenary
12. Icadil
13. Keira
14. osetsky
15. PV_TheRed
16. Roach
17. Furycan
18. RIPPE

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: empError ()
Date: September 09, 2007 10:24AM

Nice system.

How about using a score, rather than only a ranking? You could, for example, get 18 points by beating nr. 1 on the list, and 1 point for beating the last one on the list. Something like that. That would make it about equally attractive to play anyone in the list, I think. There would also have to be minus-points for the loser, for else it would pay to play as many games as possible, and we've got other things to do.

I just want to set you thinking...


Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: Perfect ()
Date: September 09, 2007 02:04PM


Hi. Im moving so I wont be on as much for a while until I get dsl at my new house.

Heres an idea for the rankings:
Why not put your challenges up on the forums so everyone knows whats going on?
Better yet. Get the admin to put up a forum for Members only challenges . This might lead to him(or her?) developing a point system for us. A little push here a little nudge there.. Just a thought. Happy conquering.
-P.

Be back soon.

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: Keira ()
Date: September 09, 2007 04:15PM

I'm missing you already :-(

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: hmmm ()
Date: September 09, 2007 07:39PM

I had a couple of recent victories vs. Keira and Capt... no ladder changes there... but it's also been at least another week of inactivity for JD, Davo, Liquid, and Hero, so they slip a slot. New rankings:

1. hmmm
2. hallali
3. Capt Planet
4. JD
5. Davo
6. Liquid
7. Hero
8. Xuul
9. jynXXX
10. Perfect
11. PV_mercenary
12. Icadil
13. Keira
14. osetsky
15. PV_TheRed
16. Roach
17. Furycan
18. RIPPE

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: hallali ()
Date: September 11, 2007 07:18AM

Due to serious computer problems I might be a off some time, but don´t forget me hihi.

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: Menegoyt ()
Date: September 12, 2007 06:46PM

I agreed to a draw with Furycan. Maybe we could have had a decision but it's been around midnight and we both were tired of a long exhausting war. So it should at least be noticed.

1. hmmm
2. hallali
3. Capt Planet
4. JD
5. Davo
6. Liquid
7. Hero
8. Xuul
9. jynXXX
10. Perfect
11. PV_mercenary
12. Icadil
13. Keira
14. osetsky
15. PV_TheRed
16. Roach
17. Furycan
18. RIPPE
19. Menegoyt

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: Keira ()
Date: September 12, 2007 08:29PM

Jynx ...isn't it unfair that RIPPE is the only person to have beaten Xuul but he languishes at the bottom ?

He is even five places behind me!

This is a guy I suspect that could put my armies thru a mincer and then make sausages out of them.


Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: jynx ()
Date: September 12, 2007 10:05PM

RIPPE likes to use alias's, not my problem.

Re: Conqueror Ladder System
Posted by: -RIPPE- ()
Date: September 13, 2007 09:17AM

Please remove my name from this ladder. I never wanted to be on it.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.