Re: --- Results 3v3 ---
Date: April 17, 2009 09:27PM
> lol limbo and i joined at the same time and limbo
> lost with aragon, 2 +2s, more lands, more armies
> and a more developed empired. emperror sures knows
> how to back teammate up when they r at a
True, Emperror does and Hubert doesn't. He attacked Tangiers, which I just took the turn before, and which is the reason I limboed (left). He has done that before. A week ago or so I was Muscovy and he was Brandenburg, so naturally I let him have Poland. but he also took Transylvania, despite the fact that I told him I need it, as it's bad enough Muscovy already has to miss Poland. When after a few turns he lost Transylvania to rebels I took it. Then the next turn he attacked me, quite in the same pattern as yesterday.
What I really liked is, that when I checked some time later Limbo had Tangiers, which only further proves that Hubert is a backstabber with poor judgment who'll make his team lose even from an advantageous position.
I don't mind playing with assholes, I know can be one myself ;) but it's impossible to play with a selfish backstabber. I always try to help teammates, and there is no justification for attacking them. And yes Limbo, I know you'll jump on this one, maybe I also had Tangiers when I was Tunis sometimes or Flanders when I was Germany, but that doesn't mean it's a rule, it depends on lots of circumstances, I would never take these lands when next to me is a good player who wants them. But if it's a noob, I'll take them as I can help better by being stronger and they just have to survive vs. their stronger oponent, and quite often I give them the lands, advanced and well, later on.
Well, no more games for me on the same team as Hubert, and for those who think he deserves another chance (I did yesterday), watch your back! ;)